The official student newspaper of The Hockaday School

The Fourcast

The official student newspaper of The Hockaday School

The Fourcast

The official student newspaper of The Hockaday School

The Fourcast

Fragments of beauty
In Focus
Fragments of beauty
Larkin Clouston and Elle MyersFebruary 29, 2024

Opinion
February Staff Standoff: Valentine's Day
Alexa Muñoz and Danya Risam-ChandiFebruary 27, 2024

Let Cupid Live - by Alexa Muñoz I have Valentine’s Day plans this year. And this is not the beginning of another malicious anti-Valentine’s...

Junior Jordan Lacsamana utilizes one of MBLs confocal lens microscopes as she observes squid embryos after staining them.
Features
Mastering marine biology
February 27, 2024

From dissections to monitoring fish tanks, the juniors and seniors who spent seven days at the Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) in Woodshole,...

The DEI Divide
The DEI Divide
February 27, 2024
Lipstick and Ledgers
January 25, 2024

Benevolent Sexism & The Art of Discussion

Benevolent+Sexism+%26+The+Art+of+Discussion

 Dear Friends,

(I’ll make this short.)

In wake of recent events regarding opinion pieces published in The Fourcast, I’d like to offer my personal opinion. You do not have to agree with me, but I ask that you respect my opinions as a fellow student, friend and journalist.

Recently a friend of mine wrote a piece regarding what she believed to be benevolent sexism. In response, people reacted negatively on social media and by word of mouth as well. However, they did so through personal attack, as her ideas were ridiculed and were the center of objectification and demeaning behavior.

Without regard to the opinions stated in the piece, I believe that responding in this way is unacceptable, as she is a hardworking journalist who simply chose to express her opinions through her writing.

As a reminder of how to facilitate and participate in healthy discussion:     

We each have our own opinions, our own beliefs and our own set of experiences. That is what makes us who we are and what makes us unique. Though we may discuss and disagree, we have no right to disparage the ideas of others and discount them as lesser than ours, whether we agree with them or not. It is one thing to express our opposing ideals in a respectful manner and another to bully another’s beliefs.

Respect is the root of character and community. We have been taught to speak our minds and fight for what we believe in. But fight in this context doesn’t mean hostility.

Fight means standing up for what you believe in, while considering the thoughts of others. Fight means communicating and acknowledging both sides before formulating an opinion. Fight means respect.  

So, I remind the community, as responsible members of society, to think about how you would like your opinions valued. Think about your actions before you comment next time or spread a rumor. There is a real person who may be hurt and affected by gossip.

Whoever said “sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me,” was obviously incorrect. Words hurt more than anything else. So please, let us use our words to communicate rather than belittle. Let our words form bonds. Let them create friendships. Let them do good in this community we all call home.

Sincerely,

Sonya Xu

Commentaries are the expressed opinion of the author and do not necessarily reflect that of The Fourcast staff, its adviser or any member of the Hockaday community.

View Comments (1)
More to Discover

Comments (1)

All The Fourcast Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • A

    AnonymousNov 24, 2015 at 3:25 pm

    I’ll try to be as unbiased as possible. As mentioned in the article, “her ideas were ridiculed and were the center of objectification and demeaning behavior”. I hope that the writer, Sonya Xu, realizes that the border between constructive criticism and straight-up mockery is quite thin. Even the most sardonic and sarcastic responses to the “Benevolent Sexism” article may serve merely as a satirical point of view in order to point out the flaws of this article, the same satirical point of view that Trevor Noah or Jon Stewart might convey in the Daily Show. Now, if Eshani did receive personal attacks from writing that article, that is truly tragic. It does take courage to take on an unpopular viewpoint and then write and publish it on a website available to everybody. And again, I’m trying to be as unbiased as possible, defending both sides of this debate. However, I hope that Eshani is not discouraged by negative reviews because such is the life of a writer.

    Reply