The official student newspaper of The Hockaday School

The Fourcast

The official student newspaper of The Hockaday School

The Fourcast

The official student newspaper of The Hockaday School

The Fourcast

Uncategorized
Vote Now! Disney Channel TV Show Bracket
Caroline Ballotta, Staff Writer • April 24, 2024

Hey Upper School! Fourcast is trying to settle one of the biggest debates of all time (in the opinion of Caroline and Jessica)… what is Upper...

Demonstration of how different swatches of colors are used in color analysis.
Opinion
Seeing your "true" colors
Leyah Philip, Opinions Editor • April 24, 2024

Do you look like a summer or a winter? Are you cool-toned or warm-toned? These are just a few of the questions that have been circulating on...

Upper School Powder Puff
Sports
Upper School Powder Puff
Mary Bradley Sutherland, Photo and Graphic Editor • April 23, 2024

Do Not Resuscitate

Do+Not+Resuscitate

With a measly 49 percent on Rotten Tomatoes and described as “exasperating” by a Philadelphia Inquirer critic, “Flatliners'” 1990 predecessor was not a hit by anyone’s standards, which begs the question–why make another?

The real answer is money. The 1990 version of “Flatliners,” although not critically acclaimed by anyone’s standards, made around $61.3 million in the US, around $144 million today, which well passed its $26 million budget. This time around, it seems, 2017’s “Flatliners,” is predicted to make much less.

With a small budget of around $20 million, “Flatliners” made a pitiful $2 million, opening day and $7 million for the weekend.

With tough competition such as the sequel to the 2014 “Kingsman” hit, “Kingsman: the Golden Circle” breaking records, it seems that “Flatliners” won’t be garnering any such awards, any time soon.

Story continues below advertisement

The premise stays true to the original. Some Chicago-based Med students try to play god and see what happens after death, which eventually makes the young adults face their past sins. As appealing as this may seem, be warned: don’t watch the trailer.  

First of all, like most movies nowadays, the trailer gives away the entire plot: manipulating death may not be the best idea, leading to inevitable mayhem.

With it’s fast-paced start and unimaginative ending, “Flatliners” is basically an extended trailer. With it’s predictable plot, it leaves the viewers one step ahead, not on the edges of their seats.

By the fourth resuscitation, the viewers aren’t exactly worried if this time they won’t make it back to continue these ridiculous experiments.

Both movies, “Flatliners” (1990), and “Flatliners” (2017), although, lure audience members in by casting well known celebrities.

In the original, actors such as Julia Roberts, who played her iconic role as Vivian in “Pretty Woman” the very same year, and the young heart-throb, Kevin Bacon were casted.

In the remake, those upon the cast were actress and activist, Ellen Page, known her her role in “Juno” which garnered her an Oscar nod, and actress, Nina Dobrev, the relatable, vampire/girl-next-door, in CW’s hit,  “The Vampire Diaries”.

But sadly for the producers, these Hollywood stars have not garnered the same appeal as its predecessor, as currently, “Flatliners” has a miserable two percent on Rotten Tomatoes. And maybe this time, if the film gods are merciful, they won’t rehash another insufferable remake of “Flatliners” any time soon.

1.5/5 STARS


Paige Halverson – Castoff Editor

Photo provided by Vimeo

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Comments (0)

All The Fourcast Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *